Your article made an interesting read: However, i am frustrated about what to use as take off point in response to a few misrepresentations that i see in your article.
Opposition is in truth, what makes democracy thick and should be as active as the ruling party if not more. However, we must recognise the peculiarities of the Nigerian situation. What type of people do we have in Nigerian politics? The real answer to this is that Nigerians are the ones involved in Nigerian politics and have turmed it into a business venture. This applies both to the ruling party and the opposition. Would it surprise you to discover that the ones that parade themselves as opposition are actually disgruntled elements from PDP who are presently displaced in a power-game they couldn't turn their way? Are you aware that the "power of Incumbency" in Nigeria which,you casually reffered to in your article means much more than one sentence you used in writing about it. That is the power that installed INEC and every other contributing agency towards the perpetration of power.How else do you explain the boast of a former PDP chairman that PDP would be in power for a century if not for this power? How else would you have vote counts more than the registered voters in a supposed election? Did you even talk about election? Well, the best we can use in qualifying what happens in Nigeria is selection and not election!
By now, you would understand why am having a problem with how to respond to your article. My brother(I guess am right), untill people who would relegate self to the background get involved in Nigerian politics, what you are seeing would continue to happen even to more horrible proportions. It applies to both the ruling party and whatever else is existing alongside. It is so bad that when the opposition complain of rigging in election, they do so not because they are pasionate about keeping democratic principles rather because they were out-rigged by the person they are complaining about.
The best we can hope for is that clean characters get the chance to be in leadership and the irony of it is that the ones you seem to have issues with could fit into that category better. What do you think now?